EF Hutton
Equity research firmAnalyst rating accuracy & track record
EF Hutton has 8 ranked equity research analysts scored by Quantellect, led by Chip Moore at #153 on the leaderboard. As a firm their picks beat their sector 32% of the time and reach their price targets 29% of the time over the following 12 months. Each Q Score is a descriptive research signal, not investment advice.
Track record re-scored weekly
Q Score by analyst
Green analysts have beaten their sector; red have trailed it.
Coverage by sector
100 rated tickers across 7 industry groups.
Coverage & companies analyzed
Analysts at EF Hutton
Ranked by Q Score| Analyst | Rank | Q Score | Win % | PT-Hit % | Sector-Excess | Calls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chip Moore | #153 | 46 | 44% | 38% | −1.4% | 30 |
| Gaurav Mehta | #224 | 32 | 39% | 25% | −5.9% | 57 |
| Michael King | #289 | 21 | 37% | 30% | −9.7% | 23 |
| Constantine Davides | #323 | 13 | 42% | 31% | −12.3% | 25 |
| Tim Moore | #376 | 0 | 30% | 25% | −18.7% | 65 |
| Edward Reilly | #421 | 0 | 21% | 27% | −27.1% | 32 |
| Michael Albanese | #433 | 0 | 26% | 32% | −32.6% | 33 |
| Tony Butler | #448 | 0 | 19% | 22% | −44.0% | 21 |
EF Hutton: analyst accuracy FAQ
How accurate are EF Hutton analysts?
Across 8 ranked analysts, EF Hutton's rated stocks beat their sector 32% of the time over the next 12 months, and their price targets are reached 29% of the time. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
How does Quantellect score analyst accuracy?
We enter each rating at the closing price on or after the call date, with no look-ahead, then measure the 12-month return above the stock's sector ETF and check whether the price target was reached. Scores are shrunk toward the population average and corrected for multiple testing, so they reflect repeatable skill rather than luck.
Analyst ratings and Q Scores are provided for informational purposes only, not investment advice. Scores are estimates derived from publicly published ratings and price targets, marked to end-of-day market data, and may be revised as new calls are published or methodology is updated. Past performance does not guarantee future results.