Oppenheimer
Equity research firmAnalyst rating accuracy & track record
Oppenheimer has 13 ranked equity research analysts scored by Quantellect, led by Chris Kotowski at #139 on the leaderboard. As a firm their picks beat their sector 36% of the time and reach their price targets 40% of the time over the following 12 months. Each Q Score is a descriptive research signal, not investment advice.
Track record re-scored weekly
Q Score by analyst
Green analysts have beaten their sector; red have trailed it.
Coverage by sector
273 rated tickers across 7 industry groups.
Coverage & companies analyzed
Analysts at Oppenheimer
Ranked by Q Score| Analyst | Rank | Q Score | Win % | PT-Hit % | Sector-Excess | Calls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Kotowski | #139 | 47 | 44% | 46% | −0.9% | 30 |
| Noah Kaye | #182 | 41 | 40% | 55% | −2.9% | 20 |
| Colin Rusch | #198 | 39 | 38% | 47% | −3.8% | 27 |
| Bryan Blair | #207 | 37 | 40% | 59% | −4.4% | 22 |
| Francois Brisebois | #209 | 36 | 41% | 27% | −4.6% | 31 |
| Jeff Jones | #231 | 31 | 33% | 25% | −6.3% | 37 |
| Ian Zaffino | #265 | 25 | 39% | 57% | −8.3% | 41 |
| Andreas Argyrides | #275 | 23 | 44% | 34% | −8.8% | 21 |
| Leland Gershell | #302 | 17 | 37% | 29% | −10.9% | 39 |
| Tyler Batory | #344 | 7 | 27% | 40% | −14.4% | 32 |
| Kristen Owen | #351 | 4 | 22% | 34% | −15.2% | 24 |
| Jay Olson | #354 | 3 | 33% | 22% | −15.5% | 25 |
| Scott Schneeberger | #364 | 0 | 28% | 50% | −16.8% | 22 |
Oppenheimer: analyst accuracy FAQ
How accurate are Oppenheimer analysts?
Across 13 ranked analysts, Oppenheimer's rated stocks beat their sector 36% of the time over the next 12 months, and their price targets are reached 40% of the time. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
How does Quantellect score analyst accuracy?
We enter each rating at the closing price on or after the call date, with no look-ahead, then measure the 12-month return above the stock's sector ETF and check whether the price target was reached. Scores are shrunk toward the population average and corrected for multiple testing, so they reflect repeatable skill rather than luck.
Analyst ratings and Q Scores are provided for informational purposes only, not investment advice. Scores are estimates derived from publicly published ratings and price targets, marked to end-of-day market data, and may be revised as new calls are published or methodology is updated. Past performance does not guarantee future results.