Joyce Beatty Stock Trades

Joyce Beatty Stock Trades

Joyce Beatty's public trading record is about as thin as disclosure law allows without being empty. Across the transaction history captured in this dataset, exactly two transactions appear in her disclosures, both sales, and neither is attributed to Beatty herself. One is attributed jointly and the other to a dependent child. There is no purchase on record at all.

That combination, zero personal attribution and zero buys, is the defining fact of this profile. It means the data cannot support any characterization of Beatty as an active trader, and it also means the two sales that do exist say more about family-level financial activity tied to her disclosure obligation than about any individual investment decision she made.

A disclosure history built on two transaction years

The record spans from an earliest transaction date of February 5, 2015 to a latest of January 18, 2019. By year, the history shows one transaction in 2015 and one in 2019, both sales. There is nothing disclosed before 2015 or after 2019 in this dataset.

The February 5, 2015 transaction carries a disclosure date of June 12, 2019. The January 18, 2019 transaction carries a disclosure date of February 21, 2019. Those different intervals are themselves part of the record and underscore why the transaction date and disclosure date must be kept distinct when reading congressional financial disclosures.

The earlier of the two sales, dated February 5, 2015, involved Lam Research Corp (ticker LRCX), disclosed in an amount range of $15,001 to $50,000 and attributed to a dependent child. Lam Research is classified in the data as Information Technology, in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. The company designs, manufactures, and services equipment used to fabricate integrated circuits, including deposition, etch, and clean systems used by chipmakers in the United States, China, Korea, Taiwan, Japan, Southeast Asia, and Europe. It is headquartered in Fremont, California. Because this transaction is attributed to a dependent child rather than to Beatty personally, it should be read as a disclosure obligation tied to a family member rather than as a decision made by the member of Congress.

The more recent sale, dated January 18, 2019, involved Attis Industries Inc, disclosed in a smaller range of $1,001 to $15,000 and attributed jointly. The dataset does not include a sector, industry, or company description for Attis Industries, so no further characterization of that business is supported by the record. Joint attribution does not establish which joint owner directed the transaction, so the record does not support assigning that decision to Beatty personally.

What the pattern does and does not show

The sector breakdown in the data reflects only these two transactions: one tagged Information Technology (the Lam Research sale) and one tagged Unknown (the Attis Industries sale, for which sector data was not available). With only two data points, this cannot be read as evidence of a sector preference or investment theme. It simply reflects the two securities that happen to appear in the disclosure record.

Likewise, because both transactions are sales and none are purchases, the record cannot support any statement about buying patterns, accumulation, or how an investment strategy developed over time. It only shows the sales that were disclosed. And because attribution is split between joint and dependent child, with zero transactions coded as self, none of this activity can be described as Beatty personally initiating a trade.

As measured on August 22, 2026, the broader population includes 537 sitting members of Congress, 276 of whom have zero disclosed trades, including 237 of 437 sitting House members. Beatty is not in that zero-trade group because she has two disclosed transactions. Separately, she does not carry a Quantellect Score: no score row exists for her at the latest published score date of August 21, 2026. At that date, 76 members had a published score, including 73 sitting members.

Disclosure and attribution notes

This profile is built entirely from official congressional financial disclosures. Transactions are reported in ranges rather than exact dollar amounts, as required under the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act and House ethics guidance, and the transaction date can precede the disclosure date by a significant margin, as seen in the 2015 Lam Research sale disclosed in 2019. Attribution codes matter: a "JT" or "DC" designation indicates joint or dependent-child attribution rather than self attribution, and this profile does not describe either sale as a personal trade by Joyce Beatty. The entries are presented as disclosed transactions with their recorded attribution, not as evidence that Beatty personally directed them.

Source filings: Periodic Transaction Report, filed February 21, 2019 and Periodic Transaction Report, filed June 12, 2019. Disclosure framework: Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act of 2012 and the House Committee on Ethics financial disclosure instruction guide.