Melanie A. Stansbury: No Disclosed Stock Trades

Melanie A. Stansbury Stock Trades 2026

Melanie A. Stansbury, the Democratic representative for New Mexico's 1st congressional district, has no stock transactions on record in Quantellect's disclosure database. Across the current term that began January 3, 2025 and runs through January 3, 2027, there is no recorded purchase, sale, or other transaction, whether attributed to her personally, a spouse, a dependent child, a joint account, or an unidentified filer category. That absence of activity is itself the finding, and it places her in company with a substantial share of her House colleagues.

What the Disclosure Record Shows

As of August 22, 2026, 276 of the 537 sitting members of Congress have no disclosed trades on file, including 237 of the chamber's 437 sitting House members. Stansbury falls into that group. Under the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act of 2012, members of Congress and covered congressional employees must report qualifying securities transactions. The House Committee on Ethics financial disclosure instruction guide explains the reporting framework, including transactions involving a filer, spouse, or dependent child. The law establishes reporting obligations for qualifying transactions; it does not require anyone to trade. A record of zero disclosed transactions is a legitimate and common outcome under that framework, not an anomaly.

Quantellect's disclosure records classify transaction attribution as belonging to the member (SELF), a spouse (SP), a joint account (JT), a dependent child (DC), or an attribution that cannot be determined from the filing (UNKNOWN). None of those categories currently contain a transaction tied to Stansbury's name in Quantellect's records, so there is nothing to attribute to her personally or to any household member.

Because there is no disclosed trading activity, there is also no frequently disclosed security to describe, no sector activity to identify, and no purchase, sale, or other transaction to place in context. The database contains zero transaction rows for Stansbury, with purchase, sale, and other transaction counts all at zero. Its transaction history by year is empty, as are its security-frequency and sector-activity records for her. The available data therefore supports a straightforward conclusion: Quantellect currently has no disclosed transaction activity associated with Stansbury in any attribution category.

Score Availability

Quantellect publishes a proprietary trading-activity score for members of Congress when a score is available. As of the latest scoring date, August 21, 2026, 76 members have a published score, including 73 who are currently serving. Stansbury does not have a score because no score row exists for her as of that date. The data consequently provides no score, tier, coverage classification, cohort rank, or cohort size for her profile.

The current record also contains no transaction date, disclosure date, disclosed amount range, ticker, company name, transaction type, attribution label, or sector entry to present for Stansbury. Those fields describe individual disclosed transactions and remain empty here because the database contains no transaction rows associated with her. As of August 22, 2026, the most accurate description of her disclosed trading activity is that there is none on record, a status shared by 237 of the 437 sitting House members tracked in the population data.

Disclosure and Methodology Note

This profile reflects transaction disclosures filed under the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act of 2012 and reported according to the House Committee on Ethics financial disclosure instruction guide. Figures describing the broader member population are current as of August 22, 2026, and figures describing score availability are current as of August 21, 2026. Transaction disclosures may be attributed to a member, a spouse, a dependent child, a joint account, or an unknown category; this page does not treat any transaction as a personal decision by the member unless the filing identifies it as such. The database covers filed transaction disclosures, so a record of zero transactions should be read as a statement about that disclosure record rather than about financial activity outside it.